This research is part of a greater bit of browse towards the classification relationships and you will associated thinking into various other social groups. All users had been checked-out immediately following providing its consent in writing. Respondents had been in hopes privacy to accomplish some paper-and-pen surveys with the ATLG actions privately. Volunteers received more credit facts because of their path grade. The fresh ethical conditions of your Chilean Look Percentage (CONICYT) was then followed.

On top of that, political self-categorization (asking throughout the governmental needs coded on the three kinds: kept, cardiovascular system and you can correct) and you will sexual orientation was in fact integrated

Participants answered group concerns to test ATLG legitimacy: gender, many years, socioeconomic condition (large, center and you may lower levels were used), and you will faith identification thanks to mind-reporting on solution to issue “You think oneself a religious people?” As well, a good cuatro-items scale size toward an effective 6-point Likert size concerning your benefits players give to their spiritual information inside their every day existence was applied.

It was developed in Northern America. ATLG is measured on a 6-point Likert scale. The instrument was translated and adapted (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008) (see the Appendix). The ATLG Spanish language version in this study had not been used with Chilean populations before. The Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94 for ATLG; 0.88 for ATL; and 0.91 for ATG (The ATLG and the two subscales demonstrated good internal consistence for this sample. The correlation for the two subscales is high (r ₍₅₀₃₎ = 0.84; p < 0.001). ATLG overall mean was 3.52 (SD = 0.75).

Large (next to 6) results exhibited deeper prejudice, and you can low ratings stated positive perceptions to your homosexuals

Part of the purpose would be to influence the underlying ATLG foundation structure. Very, around three basis activities was estimated: a single-basis design (ATLG contains a single homophobia cause applications de rencontre pour adolescents lgbt of and this all of the issues saturate); a-two-basis synchronised design (a few size made by the ATL and you will ATG subscales whoever affairs should saturate regarding the corresponding foundation try proposed) an additional buy model with several coordinated things (where ATG subscale affairs would saturate in 2 size – gay Values and Nature – and people of your ATL size create saturate from the almost every other about three – lesbian Conventional Philosophy, and you may Personal Sanction and Social Rights). These four dimensions was in fact extracted from analyses done in past degree (Cardenas Barrientos, 2008).

Overall, the fresh complement is ideal when model affairs is enhanced. Ergo, the 2-grounds second-order design is the most parsimonious for everybody spiders acquired. CFI (Comparative Improve Index) and you can NFI (Regular Match List) spiders let you know values more 0.9, them considered to be very good (Bentler Dudgeon, 1996). RFI (Cousin Boost Index) well worth means 0.nine, particularly in the 5-grounds model. On the other hand, RMSEA (Sources Mean-square Error off Approximation) directory was significant which have viewpoints less than 0.08 (Browne Kudeck, 1993), thus verifying a knowledgeable fit of your five-grounds model.

Table 3 also shows the factor saturations for each of the five sub-scales model items. All standardized saturations were significant (p < 0.001). All of the 20 items of the standardized solution loaded on the general grouping factor in the expected direction. The relation between the five latent factors is as follows (covariance): the dimension Social Rights has a high positive correlation with the factor Nature (r = 0.6); moderate positive with both Social Rights (r = 0.43) and Social Sanction (r = 0.038); and high positive with Traditional Values (r = 0.74). The dimension Nature is moderately and positively correlated with Social Rights (r = 0.32) and Social Sanction (r = 0.35), but highly and positively correlated with Traditional Values (r = 0.61). The relation of the dimension Social Rights with Social Sanction (r = 0.31) and Traditional Values (r = 0.37) is moderate high. Finally, the relation between Traditional Values and Social Sanction is moderate positive (r = 0.43).