RONULO Versus. Some body
FACTS: Rosa Catholic Parish Church of San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte. Although not, on the day of your matrimony, new going officiating priest, Fr. Mario Ragaza, refused to solemnize the wedding through to learning your couples were unsuccessful in order to safe a wedding permit. Due to the fact a recourse, Joey, who was next sporting barong tagalong, and you can Claire, clad during the a married relationship dress, together with their mothers, sponsors and guests, went on toward Separate Church off Filipino Christians, known as the newest Aglipayan Church. It questioned brand new petitioner, an enthusiastic Aglipayan priest, to execute a service to which the second arranged despite having become advised by few that they had no relationships certificate.
The latest petitioner prepared his choir and planned a bulk on few on a single date. The guy used the fresh new service from the presence of one’s bridegroom, the brand new bride-to-be, its mothers, the primary and additional sponsors and also the rest of the anticipate subscribers.
The new prosecution’s witnesses, Joseph and you may Mary Anne Yere, testified with the situations of the service. Joseph is the new veil recruit when you find yourself Mary Anne is actually brand new cord mentor about matrimony. Mary Anne affirmed one she spotted the brand new bride-to-be walk down the section. She including watched the happy couple replace its wedding rings, kiss one another, and sign a file. She heard the petitioner instructing the principal sponsors so you’re able to sign the wedding offer. Thereafter, they decided to go to the brand new reception, got meal and you can grabbed photographs. She saw the fresh new petitioner here.
Fl Umadac, the mother regarding Joey, testified you to she read the couple declare for the ceremony you to definitely it simply take one another just like the wife and husband. Weeks adopting the marriage, she went along to the latest municipal local municipal registrar away from San Nicolas, Ilocos Norte that have Atty. Mariano R. Nalupta Jr. in which she was given a certification you to definitely zero relationships permit was issued for the couples.
The brand new petitioner, when you are admitting that he conducted a service, refuted one their operate off blessing the couple was tantamount to help you a great solemnization of marriage since the contemplated by-law.
ISSUE: Obtained the petitioner try responsible for breaking Blog post 352 of your own Modified Penal Code (RPC) to possess allegedly starting an unlawful wedding.
She and additionally known the wedding invite provided to the lady by the Joey
RATIO: Petitioner conducted an illegal wedding service. The fresh new offense given that taken to in Ways 352 of the RPC is the abilities out of ily Password which reads:
(3) A wedding ceremony which takes lay to your appearance of the fresh new hiring events till the solemnizing officer as well as their personal declaration you to definitely it capture both as the couple throughout the visibility away from not less than several witnesses off judge age.
African Sites free and single dating site
Ways. 6. Zero prescribed setting otherwise spiritual rite into solemnization of the relationships needs. They would be necessary, not, with the hiring parties to look really through to the solemnizing administrator and you will claim on the exposure off no less than a couple of witnesses of court decades which they grab each other while the husband and you may wife. So it report are going to be part of the matrimony certificate and that should end up being signed by contracting functions and their witnesses and you can attested by solemnizing manager.
New Ultimate Court informed me that what made the petitioner’s operate a great wedding party and not simply a mere true blessing is actually one to when you are there’s absolutely no given form or religious rite, all of that was required is actually “towards contracting events to look privately until the solemnizing officer and declare on the presence from no less than a couple of witnesses of legal ages that they grab one another because the spouse and you will spouse.”
As to what first needs, the new petitioner admitted that activities seemed in advance of your and therefore truth is actually testified so you’re able to from the witnesses. With the 2nd needs, we find you to, up against the petitioner’s allegation, the fresh new prosecution has proven, from the testimony of witnesses, the employing people really declared which they get each other due to the fact husband and wife. Ergo, it is obvious one petitioner held a marriage ceremony rather than a mere blessing.